Nestlé abruptly dismissed Chief Executive Laurent Freixe on Monday after an internal review concluded he breached the company’s code of conduct by failing to disclose a romantic relationship with a direct subordinate. The Swiss food group moved swiftly to replace him, elevating longtime executive Philipp Navratil — most recently head of Nespresso — as CEO with immediate effect. The surprise removal, coming almost exactly a year after Freixe took the helm, risks adding fresh uncertainty to a group already wrestling with sluggish growth and heavy investor scrutiny.
The board framed the decision as necessary to uphold the company’s governance standards and corporate values. Directors said the matter was investigated after concerns surfaced through internal channels, and a subsequent probe led by senior board members found the relationship had not been properly disclosed and therefore breached internal rules. The company made clear that Freixe would not receive an exit package following his dismissal.
Investigation, accountability and governance
Board members have stressed that the action taken was rooted in governance rather than performance alone. Complaints received via Nestlé’s internal reporting mechanisms prompted an initial review that the board later said was inconclusive; persistent concerns led to a second, higher-level investigation overseen by the chairman and lead independent director and supported by external advisers. That inquiry, the board announced, confirmed the existence of an undisclosed relationship and judged it to be a violation of the code of business conduct, leaving the directors with little alternative but to remove the chief executive.
The swiftness of the dismissal reflects a broader trend among large global companies that have tightened scrutiny of senior executives’ conduct. For Nestlé, the board’s emphasis on governance sought to draw a clear line between personal misconduct and corporate standards at a time when investor patience is limited. The fact that the chairman himself is due to stand down next year has compounded the focus on boardroom stability and succession planning, and the episode is likely to accelerate internal conversations about disclosure, oversight and tone from the top.
Performance under Freixe: strategy, trade-offs and results
Freixe arrived with a public mandate to arrest a period of relative underperformance. During his first year, he outlined an action plan that combined significant cost savings with stepped-up investment in brands. The programme sought to reallocate resources to higher-growth categories and to increase marketing and advertising spend as a lever to regain market share and consumer relevance. As part of that repositioning, management announced plans to carve out the waters and premium beverages portfolio into a more focused unit and to deliver several billion francs of cost savings by 2027 to fund renewed brand investment.
On the numbers, results under Freixe were mixed. The company reported modest organic sales growth in recent reporting periods, but margins came under pressure from higher marketing outlays, currency swings and pockets of operational weakness. Analysts had been critical that the early phase of the turnaround required more visible evidence that the cost-and-investment trade-off would translate into sustainable volume growth and improved profitability. Over the past year, shareholders have punished the stock — which has underperformed peers and fallen substantially since late 2024 — reflecting unease about whether the strategic reset was progressing quickly enough.
Freixe’s agenda did win some internal support for its focus on restoring demand generation after years of relative underinvestment. Yet the execution window is narrow: investing in brands today can depress near-term margins before yielding higher sales later, and the company’s size means that turning the dial takes time. Against this backdrop, management churn at the top — with Freixe’s removal following that of his predecessor just over a year earlier — has reinforced investor doubts about the clarity and stability of the group’s medium-term plan.
What lies ahead: priorities for the new CEO and the board
The appointment of Philipp Navratil is a clear signal that the board prefers continuity and operational experience over an external shake-up. Navratil is a long-serving Nestlé executive with deep experience across the group’s coffee and beverage franchises. By choosing an insider, the directors have indicated a desire to keep the company’s broad strategy intact while minimizing disruption to daily operations and to reassure customers, employees and partners that execution will continue.
Near-term priorities for the new leadership will include demonstrating credible follow-through on the cost savings and brand-investment plan, restoring investor confidence, and strengthening governance practices. Executives will need to deliver clearer, near-term evidence that the company can convert higher marketing spending into regained market momentum without inflicting lasting damage to margins. At the same time, the board must show it has learned lessons from the episode: shareholders will want assurances that reporting channels work, that disclosures are timely and that the tone from the top supports ethical conduct.
Operational headwinds complicate the task. Nestlé faces a tough consumer backdrop in some markets, supply-chain and tariff pressures in others, and shifting consumer preferences that demand faster innovation and more nimble marketing. The carved-out water and premium beverages unit remains a strategic variable: management has indicated openness to partnerships or structural changes that could unlock value, but the approach will require careful handling to avoid further investor nervousness.
Investors are likely to press for swift, measurable progress. The combination of a fresh CEO and a pledge to stick to an existing strategy is aimed at striking a balance between reassurance and continuity; whether that will be enough depends on how quickly the new leadership can produce tangible evidence of improvement. Analysts will watch upcoming quarterly results for signs of stronger organic growth, margin stabilization, and progress against the cost-savings timetable.
The board’s handling of the governance matter itself will also come under scrutiny. With the chairman’s scheduled departure on the horizon, shareholders are expected to pay renewed attention to board composition and succession planning. Steps such as clarifying executive reporting lines, tightening disclosure protocols and increasing engagement with major investors could help restore confidence, but these measures will need to be matched by operational improvements to have a sustained impact on sentiment and the share price.
A period for proving strategy
For Nestlé, the immediate shock of a CEO dismissal for conduct-related reasons has crystalized two overlapping challenges: restoring steady leadership and proving that the strategic changes introduced under the prior year’s action plan can yield results. The board has opted for an experienced insider to steady the ship, but execution — delivering growth while managing margin trade-offs and addressing governance questions — will determine whether investors’ patience is rewarded.
The unfolding weeks and months will test how effectively the new chief can communicate a clear path forward, accelerate execution where needed, and reassure stakeholders that the company’s sizeable portfolio of household brands can return to reliable growth. For a company of Nestlé’s scale and reach, the cost of protracted uncertainty is high; the next tranche of performance data will be decisive in shaping market perception of whether leadership stability and strategy alignment have returned.
(Source:www.reuters.com)
The board framed the decision as necessary to uphold the company’s governance standards and corporate values. Directors said the matter was investigated after concerns surfaced through internal channels, and a subsequent probe led by senior board members found the relationship had not been properly disclosed and therefore breached internal rules. The company made clear that Freixe would not receive an exit package following his dismissal.
Investigation, accountability and governance
Board members have stressed that the action taken was rooted in governance rather than performance alone. Complaints received via Nestlé’s internal reporting mechanisms prompted an initial review that the board later said was inconclusive; persistent concerns led to a second, higher-level investigation overseen by the chairman and lead independent director and supported by external advisers. That inquiry, the board announced, confirmed the existence of an undisclosed relationship and judged it to be a violation of the code of business conduct, leaving the directors with little alternative but to remove the chief executive.
The swiftness of the dismissal reflects a broader trend among large global companies that have tightened scrutiny of senior executives’ conduct. For Nestlé, the board’s emphasis on governance sought to draw a clear line between personal misconduct and corporate standards at a time when investor patience is limited. The fact that the chairman himself is due to stand down next year has compounded the focus on boardroom stability and succession planning, and the episode is likely to accelerate internal conversations about disclosure, oversight and tone from the top.
Performance under Freixe: strategy, trade-offs and results
Freixe arrived with a public mandate to arrest a period of relative underperformance. During his first year, he outlined an action plan that combined significant cost savings with stepped-up investment in brands. The programme sought to reallocate resources to higher-growth categories and to increase marketing and advertising spend as a lever to regain market share and consumer relevance. As part of that repositioning, management announced plans to carve out the waters and premium beverages portfolio into a more focused unit and to deliver several billion francs of cost savings by 2027 to fund renewed brand investment.
On the numbers, results under Freixe were mixed. The company reported modest organic sales growth in recent reporting periods, but margins came under pressure from higher marketing outlays, currency swings and pockets of operational weakness. Analysts had been critical that the early phase of the turnaround required more visible evidence that the cost-and-investment trade-off would translate into sustainable volume growth and improved profitability. Over the past year, shareholders have punished the stock — which has underperformed peers and fallen substantially since late 2024 — reflecting unease about whether the strategic reset was progressing quickly enough.
Freixe’s agenda did win some internal support for its focus on restoring demand generation after years of relative underinvestment. Yet the execution window is narrow: investing in brands today can depress near-term margins before yielding higher sales later, and the company’s size means that turning the dial takes time. Against this backdrop, management churn at the top — with Freixe’s removal following that of his predecessor just over a year earlier — has reinforced investor doubts about the clarity and stability of the group’s medium-term plan.
What lies ahead: priorities for the new CEO and the board
The appointment of Philipp Navratil is a clear signal that the board prefers continuity and operational experience over an external shake-up. Navratil is a long-serving Nestlé executive with deep experience across the group’s coffee and beverage franchises. By choosing an insider, the directors have indicated a desire to keep the company’s broad strategy intact while minimizing disruption to daily operations and to reassure customers, employees and partners that execution will continue.
Near-term priorities for the new leadership will include demonstrating credible follow-through on the cost savings and brand-investment plan, restoring investor confidence, and strengthening governance practices. Executives will need to deliver clearer, near-term evidence that the company can convert higher marketing spending into regained market momentum without inflicting lasting damage to margins. At the same time, the board must show it has learned lessons from the episode: shareholders will want assurances that reporting channels work, that disclosures are timely and that the tone from the top supports ethical conduct.
Operational headwinds complicate the task. Nestlé faces a tough consumer backdrop in some markets, supply-chain and tariff pressures in others, and shifting consumer preferences that demand faster innovation and more nimble marketing. The carved-out water and premium beverages unit remains a strategic variable: management has indicated openness to partnerships or structural changes that could unlock value, but the approach will require careful handling to avoid further investor nervousness.
Investors are likely to press for swift, measurable progress. The combination of a fresh CEO and a pledge to stick to an existing strategy is aimed at striking a balance between reassurance and continuity; whether that will be enough depends on how quickly the new leadership can produce tangible evidence of improvement. Analysts will watch upcoming quarterly results for signs of stronger organic growth, margin stabilization, and progress against the cost-savings timetable.
The board’s handling of the governance matter itself will also come under scrutiny. With the chairman’s scheduled departure on the horizon, shareholders are expected to pay renewed attention to board composition and succession planning. Steps such as clarifying executive reporting lines, tightening disclosure protocols and increasing engagement with major investors could help restore confidence, but these measures will need to be matched by operational improvements to have a sustained impact on sentiment and the share price.
A period for proving strategy
For Nestlé, the immediate shock of a CEO dismissal for conduct-related reasons has crystalized two overlapping challenges: restoring steady leadership and proving that the strategic changes introduced under the prior year’s action plan can yield results. The board has opted for an experienced insider to steady the ship, but execution — delivering growth while managing margin trade-offs and addressing governance questions — will determine whether investors’ patience is rewarded.
The unfolding weeks and months will test how effectively the new chief can communicate a clear path forward, accelerate execution where needed, and reassure stakeholders that the company’s sizeable portfolio of household brands can return to reliable growth. For a company of Nestlé’s scale and reach, the cost of protracted uncertainty is high; the next tranche of performance data will be decisive in shaping market perception of whether leadership stability and strategy alignment have returned.
(Source:www.reuters.com)
Homepage
Send to a friend
Printable version
Share
