At the 2025 COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil, the conspicuous absence of a senior delegation from the United States has provided the People’s Republic of China an unexpected opening to assume a more visible and influential role in global climate governance. While the United States has been a cornerstone in past negotiations—acting as convener, back-stop and security blanket for many climate deals—its current posture has created a vacuum that China is stepping into. As China elevates its presence both on the exhibition floors and behind the negotiating tables, the dynamics of climate diplomacy are visibly shifting. China’s role now extends beyond manufacturing solar panels and electric vehicles; it is shaping the agenda, brokering regional alignments, and seeking to redefine its position from a major emitter to a climate power.
This change of guard is neither sudden nor entirely unexpected. Over the past decade, China has built the world’s largest renewable-energy and electric-vehicle sectors, invested heavily in Global South clean-energy infrastructure, and deepened its diplomatic networks in climate forums. With the U.S. federal government signalling disengagement—no senior official attendance, no visible high-level delegation—the stage has cleared for China to play up its advantages. The positioning is not just about optics: China is using its manufacturing capacity, green-finance flows, and diplomatic heft to underpin its ambition to emerge as a stabilising actor in climate governance. In doing so, it seeks to occupy a dual role: a climate-policy leader and a strategic counterweight to the absent U.S.
How China is Projecting Influence at COP30
In Belém, China’s presence is highly stylised and meticulously orchestrated. Its national pavilion at the summit dominates a prime location at the entrance of the sprawling conference grounds, signalling ambition and visibility. Chinese clean-energy giants such as CATL, BYD Auto, Trina Solar and Longi Green Energy Technology are presenting in English to wide audiences, launching product demonstrations, and offering one-on-one sessions with diplomats and business delegations. BYD, for example, displayed a fleet of plug-in hybrids adapted to bio-fuel manufactured in Brazil, blending a commercial pitch with a geopolitical narrative of South-South cooperation.
Beyond promenade displays, Chinese diplomats are engaging behind the scenes as mediators and agenda-shapers. China is reported to have helped steer the COP30 agenda in advance of formal negotiations, taking initiative that previously would have been the domain of the U.S. delegation. In bilateral and multilateral side-events China emphasises its role as a technology provider and funder of solutions for developing countries. Officials highlight China’s green exports and investment in renewable-energy supply chains as a form of strategic climate leadership, embracing the message that “we have solutions—and we can take them internationally.” The leverage comes from China’s dominance as the world’s largest installer of solar, wind and battery capacity, and its capacity to export that infrastructure at competitive cost.
The United States’ decision to skip official high-level participation at COP30 is more than symbolic. The U.S. has historically been the largest cumulative emitter of greenhouse gases; it has played a central role in creating and sustaining the global climate regime and mobilising finance, technology, and policy alliances. Its absence signals to many countries that climate diplomacy is entering a less U.S.-centred era. Domestic policy shifts—such as dismantling or scaling back U.S. climate negotiating offices, prioritising fossil-fuel production, and refusing to send a senior-level delegation—have eroded the credibility of U.S. leadership. Without the U.S. anchor, other major powers and emerging economies are left to fill the vacuum, and China is actively moving into that space.
This shift has strategic consequences. For developing countries, China positions itself as the partner for technology and finance, offering low-carbon infrastructure where the U.S. is noticeably absent. For alliances of smaller nations and the Global South, China is asserting that access to its supply chains, recyclable commodities, and climate-investment platforms gives Beijing a seat at the table previously reserved for Washington. Meanwhile, U.S. non-participation creates ambiguity around which actor will convene coalitions, finance mitigation efforts, and enforce accountability—functions that China is now willing to undertake or influence. In short, the U.S. vacuum is not simply missing tone-setting; it is handing initiative to China.
The Motives Behind China’s Advance
China’s expansion of climate leadership is driven by several interlocking motives. First, it is responding to industrial opportunity. As the global economy pivots toward decarbonisation, China is leveraging its manufacturing scale and cost advantages to dominate solar-panel production, battery manufacturing, wind-turbine supply, and electric-vehicle exports. By tying its climate-diplomacy narrative to these strengths, Beijing reframes its emission-intensive past into an economic asset for a low-carbon future.
Second, China seeks geopolitical gains. By providing climate infrastructure and finance to the Global South, China strengthens diplomatic ties, builds influence in resource-rich developing nations, and embeds itself in green-value-chain relationships. At COP30, this pivot is evident: Chinese officials emphasise that the shift to low-carbon development benefits “countries of the Global South,” offering China a platform as both donor and enabler.
Third, China is anticipating shifting power structures in global climate governance. With the U.S. stepping back, China sees an opening to shape new norms, rules, and financial flows. By leading in side-events, presentations and pavilion diplomacy, China projects the message that it is fit to fill the role of global climate steward—if not in all respects, then in many. This advance aligns with broader ambitions to position China as a global systemic actor rather than simply a regional power.
Constraints and Credibility Challenges
Despite its ascendancy, China faces constraints and skepticism. Critics point out that while China leads in renewable manufacturing and exports, it remains the world’s largest annual emitter of greenhouse gases and continues to heavily rely on coal in its domestic energy mix. Some analysts argue that China’s climate-diplomacy push is partially opportunistic—aimed more at market share and geopolitical influence than genuine transformational change. Questions also linger around whether China’s climate commitments are sufficiently ambitious: for example, modest emission-reduction pledges compared with peer economies may raise doubts about its leadership at home.
Moreover, the deputy climate negotiators note that dominance in pavilion real-estate and side-events does not automatically equate to rule-making power. Leadership in climate diplomacy still depends on the ability to build coalitions, mobilise finance, enforce accountability and drive implementation. Observers note that China still falls short of those thresholds. The U.S., despite its absence, retains the financial and technological muscle and the reputational credit needed to convene major climate deals. If China does not transition from spectacle to substance, its leadership claims may prove fragile.
China’s expanding role at COP30 signals a transition in the architecture of climate governance. Where once the U.S. sat at the centre of many climate multilateral efforts, power is shifting: distribution of leadership is becoming more multipolar. That reflects the real-world dynamics: China has overtaken the U.S. as the world’s largest emitter and now leads in deploying clean-energy capacity; a leadership role in global politics and economics naturally follows. For developing nations, China’s broader presence as a provider of green goods, infrastructure and finance may shift their alignments and expectations away from Washington.
For the climate regime itself, these changes may affect agenda-setting, financing norms, and implementation pathways. If China becomes a central broker of low-carbon investments and technology transfers, the role of the U.S. dollar-centric climate-finance framework may diminish. Supply-chain networks anchored in China’s industrial strengths could steer the geography and pace of decarbonisation in developing regions.
Finally, the U.S. retreat at COP30 may have broader ramifications for global governance. It signals that climate multilateralism cannot rely on one nation alone for leadership. The absence of the U.S. creates opportunity—but also risk. If other actors do not step in to fill the convening and financing gaps, global momentum on climate action could falter. But China’s willingness to engage more deeply suggests that another power axis is rising in the realm of climate politics.
In the context of COP30, China is capitalising on the U.S. strategic absence to reposition its global role in climate diplomacy. Whether this shift translates into durable leadership, enhanced climate action, and a more equitable climate order depends on how China navigates its dual identity—as a major emitter and a green-technology powerhouse—and how the rest of the world responds to this realignment.
(Source:www.reuters.com)
This change of guard is neither sudden nor entirely unexpected. Over the past decade, China has built the world’s largest renewable-energy and electric-vehicle sectors, invested heavily in Global South clean-energy infrastructure, and deepened its diplomatic networks in climate forums. With the U.S. federal government signalling disengagement—no senior official attendance, no visible high-level delegation—the stage has cleared for China to play up its advantages. The positioning is not just about optics: China is using its manufacturing capacity, green-finance flows, and diplomatic heft to underpin its ambition to emerge as a stabilising actor in climate governance. In doing so, it seeks to occupy a dual role: a climate-policy leader and a strategic counterweight to the absent U.S.
How China is Projecting Influence at COP30
In Belém, China’s presence is highly stylised and meticulously orchestrated. Its national pavilion at the summit dominates a prime location at the entrance of the sprawling conference grounds, signalling ambition and visibility. Chinese clean-energy giants such as CATL, BYD Auto, Trina Solar and Longi Green Energy Technology are presenting in English to wide audiences, launching product demonstrations, and offering one-on-one sessions with diplomats and business delegations. BYD, for example, displayed a fleet of plug-in hybrids adapted to bio-fuel manufactured in Brazil, blending a commercial pitch with a geopolitical narrative of South-South cooperation.
Beyond promenade displays, Chinese diplomats are engaging behind the scenes as mediators and agenda-shapers. China is reported to have helped steer the COP30 agenda in advance of formal negotiations, taking initiative that previously would have been the domain of the U.S. delegation. In bilateral and multilateral side-events China emphasises its role as a technology provider and funder of solutions for developing countries. Officials highlight China’s green exports and investment in renewable-energy supply chains as a form of strategic climate leadership, embracing the message that “we have solutions—and we can take them internationally.” The leverage comes from China’s dominance as the world’s largest installer of solar, wind and battery capacity, and its capacity to export that infrastructure at competitive cost.
The United States’ decision to skip official high-level participation at COP30 is more than symbolic. The U.S. has historically been the largest cumulative emitter of greenhouse gases; it has played a central role in creating and sustaining the global climate regime and mobilising finance, technology, and policy alliances. Its absence signals to many countries that climate diplomacy is entering a less U.S.-centred era. Domestic policy shifts—such as dismantling or scaling back U.S. climate negotiating offices, prioritising fossil-fuel production, and refusing to send a senior-level delegation—have eroded the credibility of U.S. leadership. Without the U.S. anchor, other major powers and emerging economies are left to fill the vacuum, and China is actively moving into that space.
This shift has strategic consequences. For developing countries, China positions itself as the partner for technology and finance, offering low-carbon infrastructure where the U.S. is noticeably absent. For alliances of smaller nations and the Global South, China is asserting that access to its supply chains, recyclable commodities, and climate-investment platforms gives Beijing a seat at the table previously reserved for Washington. Meanwhile, U.S. non-participation creates ambiguity around which actor will convene coalitions, finance mitigation efforts, and enforce accountability—functions that China is now willing to undertake or influence. In short, the U.S. vacuum is not simply missing tone-setting; it is handing initiative to China.
The Motives Behind China’s Advance
China’s expansion of climate leadership is driven by several interlocking motives. First, it is responding to industrial opportunity. As the global economy pivots toward decarbonisation, China is leveraging its manufacturing scale and cost advantages to dominate solar-panel production, battery manufacturing, wind-turbine supply, and electric-vehicle exports. By tying its climate-diplomacy narrative to these strengths, Beijing reframes its emission-intensive past into an economic asset for a low-carbon future.
Second, China seeks geopolitical gains. By providing climate infrastructure and finance to the Global South, China strengthens diplomatic ties, builds influence in resource-rich developing nations, and embeds itself in green-value-chain relationships. At COP30, this pivot is evident: Chinese officials emphasise that the shift to low-carbon development benefits “countries of the Global South,” offering China a platform as both donor and enabler.
Third, China is anticipating shifting power structures in global climate governance. With the U.S. stepping back, China sees an opening to shape new norms, rules, and financial flows. By leading in side-events, presentations and pavilion diplomacy, China projects the message that it is fit to fill the role of global climate steward—if not in all respects, then in many. This advance aligns with broader ambitions to position China as a global systemic actor rather than simply a regional power.
Constraints and Credibility Challenges
Despite its ascendancy, China faces constraints and skepticism. Critics point out that while China leads in renewable manufacturing and exports, it remains the world’s largest annual emitter of greenhouse gases and continues to heavily rely on coal in its domestic energy mix. Some analysts argue that China’s climate-diplomacy push is partially opportunistic—aimed more at market share and geopolitical influence than genuine transformational change. Questions also linger around whether China’s climate commitments are sufficiently ambitious: for example, modest emission-reduction pledges compared with peer economies may raise doubts about its leadership at home.
Moreover, the deputy climate negotiators note that dominance in pavilion real-estate and side-events does not automatically equate to rule-making power. Leadership in climate diplomacy still depends on the ability to build coalitions, mobilise finance, enforce accountability and drive implementation. Observers note that China still falls short of those thresholds. The U.S., despite its absence, retains the financial and technological muscle and the reputational credit needed to convene major climate deals. If China does not transition from spectacle to substance, its leadership claims may prove fragile.
China’s expanding role at COP30 signals a transition in the architecture of climate governance. Where once the U.S. sat at the centre of many climate multilateral efforts, power is shifting: distribution of leadership is becoming more multipolar. That reflects the real-world dynamics: China has overtaken the U.S. as the world’s largest emitter and now leads in deploying clean-energy capacity; a leadership role in global politics and economics naturally follows. For developing nations, China’s broader presence as a provider of green goods, infrastructure and finance may shift their alignments and expectations away from Washington.
For the climate regime itself, these changes may affect agenda-setting, financing norms, and implementation pathways. If China becomes a central broker of low-carbon investments and technology transfers, the role of the U.S. dollar-centric climate-finance framework may diminish. Supply-chain networks anchored in China’s industrial strengths could steer the geography and pace of decarbonisation in developing regions.
Finally, the U.S. retreat at COP30 may have broader ramifications for global governance. It signals that climate multilateralism cannot rely on one nation alone for leadership. The absence of the U.S. creates opportunity—but also risk. If other actors do not step in to fill the convening and financing gaps, global momentum on climate action could falter. But China’s willingness to engage more deeply suggests that another power axis is rising in the realm of climate politics.
In the context of COP30, China is capitalising on the U.S. strategic absence to reposition its global role in climate diplomacy. Whether this shift translates into durable leadership, enhanced climate action, and a more equitable climate order depends on how China navigates its dual identity—as a major emitter and a green-technology powerhouse—and how the rest of the world responds to this realignment.
(Source:www.reuters.com)
Homepage
Send to a friend
Printable version
Share
