Chegg Inc., once a high-flying provider of textbook rentals, homework help and online tutoring, announced on Monday it will eliminate approximately 22 percent of its global workforce—roughly 248 positions—in a bid to rein in costs and reposition itself amid a seismic shift toward free generative AI tools in education. The layoffs mark the latest upheaval for the Santa Clara–based company, which has seen web traffic and subscriber numbers plunge as students increasingly turn to AI-driven platforms such as ChatGPT for on-demand solutions.
According to Chegg’s first-quarter 2025 earnings report, the company’s subscriber base shrank by 31 percent year over year to 3.2 million, while total revenue tumbled 30 percent to \$121 million. Subscription services, historically the engine of Chegg’s growth, fell by nearly a third to \$108 million. Management warned these bleak trends are likely to persist in the near term, prompting a broad restructuring plan aimed at streamlining operations.
Under the restructuring, Chegg will shutter its U.S. and Canada offices by year-end and dramatically reduce spending on marketing, product development and general administrative functions. The company expects to incur one-time charges of \$34 million to \$38 million over the second and third quarters but projects cost savings of \$45 million to \$55 million in 2025 and \$100 million to \$110 million in 2026.
AI Disruption Fuels Traffic Declines
Chegg executives cite the rapid proliferation of AI-powered study aids as the principal driver of its decline. With OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini and AI Overviews, plus offerings from Anthropic and other startups, students can now summon explanations, worked examples and essay drafts at no charge—undercutting Chegg’s paid model. Internally, the company has tracked a significant migration of query volume away from its sites into AI-enabled search and chat interfaces, where proprietary textbook solutions and step-by-step guides are often served alongside or in lieu of traditional search results.
In a legal salvo earlier this year, Chegg sued Google in Washington, D.C., alleging that the search giant’s AI-generated summaries siphon traffic from original content providers. Chegg argues that by condensing and presenting textbook solutions directly in search, Google has eroded user engagement and undercut publishers’ incentives to create high-quality educational material. The suit, which invokes U.S. antitrust statutes and digital publishing rights, underscores Chegg’s broader struggle to assert value in an environment where AI can deliver instant answers without subscription fees.
A Pivot to AI and Broader Student Support
In response to the AI onslaught, Chegg last year forged a pilot partnership with OpenAI to integrate an AI-powered assistant—branded internally as Cheggmate—into its platform. The bot is designed to help students with personalized study plans, coding challenges and reading comprehension. However, adoption has been mixed, according to people familiar with the rollout, as learners accustomed to the free, open-ended nature of ChatGPT have been slow to migrate back to a fee-based system.
To broaden its appeal, Chegg is also accelerating development of ancillary services, including financial literacy modules, early career planning tools and community forums. Management believes that by offering a “360-degree” support ecosystem, the company can differentiate itself from generic AI chatbots and build deeper engagement with serious learners. Nevertheless, these initiatives carry upfront costs and demand significant investment in content creation, platform security and personalization algorithms—factors that contributed to the decision to slim down headcount.
EdTech Investment Plummets in AI Era
The challenges confronting Chegg reflect a wider reckoning in the education-technology sector. After a pandemic-fueled boom in 2020–21, venture capital investment in edtech has collapsed to its lowest level in over a decade. Last year saw less than \$3 billion poured into online learning startups, compared to more than \$17 billion at the peak. Investors have cooled on platforms offering video lectures or subscription-based learning support, opting instead to back generative AI ventures that promise rapid innovation and lower content costs.
Some companies have thrived by embedding AI features—Duolingo, for instance, reports that its AI-driven language exercises have boosted user retention and engagement, translating into record subscriber growth. Others, like Coursera and Khan Academy, are racing to incorporate coaching bots, automated grading and interactive simulations. For legacy players that built their businesses on curated content libraries and live tutoring sessions, the imperative to adapt has become existential.
Chegg’s decision to close its North American offices aligns with a broader cost-rationalization wave across tech firms, many of which have maintained hybrid or fully remote workforces since the pandemic. By consolidating functions into centralized hubs and outsourcing non-core tasks, the company aims to reduce its real estate footprint and redeploy resources toward AI product development. Human resources and finance teams will be consolidated into shared service centers, while customer support functions are being migrated to lower-cost locations overseas.
Company insiders say the layoffs prioritised roles deemed non-critical to the new strategic focus, such as certain marketing functions and mid-level product management positions. A small number of senior leadership roles have also been eliminated as part of a flattening of the organizational hierarchy. Chegg has committed to providing affected employees with severance packages, continued health coverage and placement support services.
Analyst Perspectives and Market Reactions
Wall Street analysts offered mixed assessments of the move. Some praised the bold cost cuts and refocusing on AI integration, suggesting that clearing out underperforming segments could pave the way for renewed margins once subscriber growth stabilizes. Others cautioned that the layoffs, while necessary, do little to address the core issue: the competitive advantage of free AI chatbots that continually improve via massive data inputs and advanced language models.
Chegg’s stock price, which has fallen more than 90 percent from its pandemic-era highs, dipped modestly in after-hours trading as investors digested the news. Market observers will be closely watching Chegg’s Q2 guidance to see whether the cost savings materialize and if any stabilization in traffic emerges as the company rolls out its revamped AI offerings.
The transformation at Chegg is emblematic of a turning point in digital learning. As students gain access to increasingly sophisticated AI tutors capable of code debugging, mathematical proofs and essay composition, the value proposition of subscription-based homework services is under siege. Educators and policymakers are grappling with questions about academic integrity, AI’s role in personalized learning and the economics of content creation in an AI-dominated environment.
For incumbent edtech companies, the choice is clear: invest heavily in proprietary AI capabilities, diversify into non-academic forms of student support, or face continued erosion of market share. Some may explore mergers or acquisitions to acquire AI talent and accelerate product roadmaps. Others might pivot toward enterprise partnerships, selling AI-augmented learning solutions to school districts and large universities under multi-year contracts.
With the U.S.-Canada restructuring set to conclude by year’s end and projected savings slated to bolster Chegg’s balance sheet, management believes the company can emerge leaner and more agile. Yet the speed and breadth of AI innovation means that competitive pressures will not relent. As Chegg seeks to redefine its identity in a world where textbook answers can be conjured by an AI prompt, the success of its pivot may hinge on its ability to deliver uniquely valuable, personalized experiences that students are willing to pay for—an uphill battle in an era of free, on-demand intelligence.
(Source:www.usnews.com)
According to Chegg’s first-quarter 2025 earnings report, the company’s subscriber base shrank by 31 percent year over year to 3.2 million, while total revenue tumbled 30 percent to \$121 million. Subscription services, historically the engine of Chegg’s growth, fell by nearly a third to \$108 million. Management warned these bleak trends are likely to persist in the near term, prompting a broad restructuring plan aimed at streamlining operations.
Under the restructuring, Chegg will shutter its U.S. and Canada offices by year-end and dramatically reduce spending on marketing, product development and general administrative functions. The company expects to incur one-time charges of \$34 million to \$38 million over the second and third quarters but projects cost savings of \$45 million to \$55 million in 2025 and \$100 million to \$110 million in 2026.
AI Disruption Fuels Traffic Declines
Chegg executives cite the rapid proliferation of AI-powered study aids as the principal driver of its decline. With OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini and AI Overviews, plus offerings from Anthropic and other startups, students can now summon explanations, worked examples and essay drafts at no charge—undercutting Chegg’s paid model. Internally, the company has tracked a significant migration of query volume away from its sites into AI-enabled search and chat interfaces, where proprietary textbook solutions and step-by-step guides are often served alongside or in lieu of traditional search results.
In a legal salvo earlier this year, Chegg sued Google in Washington, D.C., alleging that the search giant’s AI-generated summaries siphon traffic from original content providers. Chegg argues that by condensing and presenting textbook solutions directly in search, Google has eroded user engagement and undercut publishers’ incentives to create high-quality educational material. The suit, which invokes U.S. antitrust statutes and digital publishing rights, underscores Chegg’s broader struggle to assert value in an environment where AI can deliver instant answers without subscription fees.
A Pivot to AI and Broader Student Support
In response to the AI onslaught, Chegg last year forged a pilot partnership with OpenAI to integrate an AI-powered assistant—branded internally as Cheggmate—into its platform. The bot is designed to help students with personalized study plans, coding challenges and reading comprehension. However, adoption has been mixed, according to people familiar with the rollout, as learners accustomed to the free, open-ended nature of ChatGPT have been slow to migrate back to a fee-based system.
To broaden its appeal, Chegg is also accelerating development of ancillary services, including financial literacy modules, early career planning tools and community forums. Management believes that by offering a “360-degree” support ecosystem, the company can differentiate itself from generic AI chatbots and build deeper engagement with serious learners. Nevertheless, these initiatives carry upfront costs and demand significant investment in content creation, platform security and personalization algorithms—factors that contributed to the decision to slim down headcount.
EdTech Investment Plummets in AI Era
The challenges confronting Chegg reflect a wider reckoning in the education-technology sector. After a pandemic-fueled boom in 2020–21, venture capital investment in edtech has collapsed to its lowest level in over a decade. Last year saw less than \$3 billion poured into online learning startups, compared to more than \$17 billion at the peak. Investors have cooled on platforms offering video lectures or subscription-based learning support, opting instead to back generative AI ventures that promise rapid innovation and lower content costs.
Some companies have thrived by embedding AI features—Duolingo, for instance, reports that its AI-driven language exercises have boosted user retention and engagement, translating into record subscriber growth. Others, like Coursera and Khan Academy, are racing to incorporate coaching bots, automated grading and interactive simulations. For legacy players that built their businesses on curated content libraries and live tutoring sessions, the imperative to adapt has become existential.
Chegg’s decision to close its North American offices aligns with a broader cost-rationalization wave across tech firms, many of which have maintained hybrid or fully remote workforces since the pandemic. By consolidating functions into centralized hubs and outsourcing non-core tasks, the company aims to reduce its real estate footprint and redeploy resources toward AI product development. Human resources and finance teams will be consolidated into shared service centers, while customer support functions are being migrated to lower-cost locations overseas.
Company insiders say the layoffs prioritised roles deemed non-critical to the new strategic focus, such as certain marketing functions and mid-level product management positions. A small number of senior leadership roles have also been eliminated as part of a flattening of the organizational hierarchy. Chegg has committed to providing affected employees with severance packages, continued health coverage and placement support services.
Analyst Perspectives and Market Reactions
Wall Street analysts offered mixed assessments of the move. Some praised the bold cost cuts and refocusing on AI integration, suggesting that clearing out underperforming segments could pave the way for renewed margins once subscriber growth stabilizes. Others cautioned that the layoffs, while necessary, do little to address the core issue: the competitive advantage of free AI chatbots that continually improve via massive data inputs and advanced language models.
Chegg’s stock price, which has fallen more than 90 percent from its pandemic-era highs, dipped modestly in after-hours trading as investors digested the news. Market observers will be closely watching Chegg’s Q2 guidance to see whether the cost savings materialize and if any stabilization in traffic emerges as the company rolls out its revamped AI offerings.
The transformation at Chegg is emblematic of a turning point in digital learning. As students gain access to increasingly sophisticated AI tutors capable of code debugging, mathematical proofs and essay composition, the value proposition of subscription-based homework services is under siege. Educators and policymakers are grappling with questions about academic integrity, AI’s role in personalized learning and the economics of content creation in an AI-dominated environment.
For incumbent edtech companies, the choice is clear: invest heavily in proprietary AI capabilities, diversify into non-academic forms of student support, or face continued erosion of market share. Some may explore mergers or acquisitions to acquire AI talent and accelerate product roadmaps. Others might pivot toward enterprise partnerships, selling AI-augmented learning solutions to school districts and large universities under multi-year contracts.
With the U.S.-Canada restructuring set to conclude by year’s end and projected savings slated to bolster Chegg’s balance sheet, management believes the company can emerge leaner and more agile. Yet the speed and breadth of AI innovation means that competitive pressures will not relent. As Chegg seeks to redefine its identity in a world where textbook answers can be conjured by an AI prompt, the success of its pivot may hinge on its ability to deliver uniquely valuable, personalized experiences that students are willing to pay for—an uphill battle in an era of free, on-demand intelligence.
(Source:www.usnews.com)
Homepage
Send to a friend
Printable version
Share
